[Fwd: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my!]

[Karsten Wade]

FYI, we have a need for some help in compiling FOP with gcj.  This is a
prerequisite to getting FOP support in xmlto.  For details from Tommy,
see below.

thx - Karsten

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Tommy Reynolds <Tommy.Reynolds at MegaCoder.com>
Reply-To: For participants of the Documentation Project
<fedora-docs-list at redhat.com>
To: fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my!
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:16:47 -0700

Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>, spake thus:

> Tommy - is the barrier to having make run the Java tools the lack of
> support in xmlto?  If we're this close, maybe we can get xmlto updated
> in the devel tree (rawhide) right away.  Bonus would be if we could see
> all of this pushed eventually into updates to FCs 5 and 6.

Karsten,

I've had XMLTO working with FOP, and producing PDF's, for quite a
while now.  As Paul W Frields as pointed out, the PDF's look awful
because we need work on the stylesheet.

As you probably remember, I sent the appropriate XMLTO patches for
FOP to Tim Waugh many, many moons ago.  AIUI, his reluctance to add
them officially has been mostly that FOP wasn't free.  The FOP
dependancy in the XMLTO RPM would be endlessly confusing.

If needed I could mangle the patches to use either FOP or passivetex
so as not to break things while our FOP implementation matures, with
the default renderer being passivetex.  These are just minor details.

I lack the java-fu to compile FOP using gcj; if someone could do
it for me, and maybe send me the patches, I could provide Tim a 
with a complete package.

In summary:

1) If we could get someone to provide patches to compile FOP using
gcj, I could do the RPM-fu.

2) Having hopes of a FOP rpm, I can update the XMLTO rpm to utilize it.

3) Present Tim Waugh with a fait acompli.

I'm not sure that #3 is sufficient to get the updates into rawhide,
but it's a necessary step.

Cheers

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20060915/7e243718/attachment.sig>