[fedora-java] Separate ecj SRPM

Andrew Overholt overholt at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 21:08:55 UTC 2009


On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:06 -0500, David Walluck wrote:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > One concern is that RHEL-5 has an unversioned Obsoletes/Provides on
> > "ecj" which should probably get fixed.
> 
> Fedora eclipse-ecj is also missing an epoch, but only for the ecj 
> Provides and Obsoletes.

Yeah, I saw that :)  Thanks.

> Aside from that, I am all for a standalone ecj.

Cool.

Andrew




More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list