[fedora-java] Separate ecj SRPM
Andrew Overholt
overholt at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 21:08:55 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:06 -0500, David Walluck wrote:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > One concern is that RHEL-5 has an unversioned Obsoletes/Provides on
> > "ecj" which should probably get fixed.
>
> Fedora eclipse-ecj is also missing an epoch, but only for the ecj
> Provides and Obsoletes.
Yeah, I saw that :) Thanks.
> Aside from that, I am all for a standalone ecj.
Cool.
Andrew
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list