Fedora minimal install option, a discussion with a 4 month life cycle

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:26, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra (rms at 1407.org) said: 
> > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 14:35, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> > > I've said it before and I'll say it again.... i HIGHLY doubt
> > > anaconda is going to be hacked to provide more dials and knobs as part
> > > of the install that are already present.
> > 
> > There's no need for another dialog or knob. A group can be specified in
> > a KickStart installation.
> 
> And, in kickstart, you can pick the 'core' group. Which is probably what
> these people may be looking for.

I must confess I never tried to explicit mention core.
I had expected that not saying anything would bring up the bare minimum
(which it doesn't since I had to try cutting rpms by using -package).

Thanks, with that cleared up, I think I am satisfied (by looking into
FC's comps.xml).

Hugs, Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031205/90602501/attachment.sig>