FC2 initial schedule posted

Chris Funderburg chris at funderburg.com
Mon Dec 15 23:17:44 UTC 2003


seth vidal wrote:

>On
>  
>
>>We have half a server room sitting here with Sun Enterprise machines 
>>gathering dust.
>>I *really* don't want to install Solaris 9 on them if I don't have too.  
>>So, how realistic
>>is that for FC2 and how much work will it take?  If  (eventually) it 
>>gets into FC,
>>will it then go into the next RedHat Enterprise?
>>
>>Also, I'd really like to help with testing any eventual SPARC rpm's, but 
>>are there any HOWTO's
>>somewhere on how to set up the absolute *basic* (RPM based) system that 
>>doesn't need to boot into Solaris?
>>    
>>
>
>If you have the time I think there is some need for more sparc-based
>build machines.
>
>if they are really gathering dust....
>-sv
>
>  
>
Seriously, I have 9 Netra T1 105's, 2 Ultra Enterprise 450's, 2 
Enterprise 250's, and even
1 Enterprise 4500.  They're all a bit old, but in i386 terms, these are 
roughly "pentium III" class
machines.  If anyone wants wants a test build and a bit of stress 
testing I'm your man.

cf





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list