FC2 initial schedule posted
Chris Funderburg
chris at funderburg.com
Mon Dec 15 23:17:44 UTC 2003
seth vidal wrote:
>On
>
>
>>We have half a server room sitting here with Sun Enterprise machines
>>gathering dust.
>>I *really* don't want to install Solaris 9 on them if I don't have too.
>>So, how realistic
>>is that for FC2 and how much work will it take? If (eventually) it
>>gets into FC,
>>will it then go into the next RedHat Enterprise?
>>
>>Also, I'd really like to help with testing any eventual SPARC rpm's, but
>>are there any HOWTO's
>>somewhere on how to set up the absolute *basic* (RPM based) system that
>>doesn't need to boot into Solaris?
>>
>>
>
>If you have the time I think there is some need for more sparc-based
>build machines.
>
>if they are really gathering dust....
>-sv
>
>
>
Seriously, I have 9 Netra T1 105's, 2 Ultra Enterprise 450's, 2
Enterprise 250's, and even
1 Enterprise 4500. They're all a bit old, but in i386 terms, these are
roughly "pentium III" class
machines. If anyone wants wants a test build and a bit of stress
testing I'm your man.
cf
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list