Warren' rejection of cooperation with other repos
Panu Matilainen
pmatilai at welho.com
Sat Nov 8 16:53:18 UTC 2003
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> > I find it kinda funny that people who refuse to co-operate within policies
> > and specifications created by the fedora.us community complain about
> > fedora.us not co-operating with them :-/
>
> Most packagers were fed up even before decent policies and specifications
> existed. Even before there was a common infrastructure or Fedora had any
> packages committed. Whereas most 3rd party packagers already had more
> packages then Fedora currently. This was a very different situation.
>
> How those policies and specifications were made and the atitude of those
> in charge towards existing repositories explain why a lot (most?) of
> packagers left frustrated. And of course the fact that some of these
> specifications made it impossible to be compatible didn't do any good
> either.
Oh well, I'm speaking as someone who didn't have a repository of my own
and didn't want to create one so there was no change and thus no pain. I
think I do understand the pain involved for existing repositories and yes,
there certainly was some rough rides in early fedora.us discussions.
>
> I don't really understand how the project on one hand hopes/begs existing
> packagers to submit their packages and on the other hand treats them
> arrogantly and ignores their advice.
> I also don't understand why the current negative critism towards the 3rd
> party packagers will get us any closer and I was a bit of surprised that
> Warren had to bring that up _again_.
>
> I can only hope Red Hat's involvement can change the atmosphere a bit.
Oh I sure hope the new Fedora project will bring peace and love to all as
well, hostility wont get us anywhere.
- Panu -
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list