[Univ-linux] Future unsupported Red Hat Linux systems

[Stephen Smoogen]

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 06:08, seth vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 05:29, Warren Togami wrote:
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > >>Maybe this is still in the process of being decided upon, or maybe there's
> > >>a better place to discuss this?  If either, please LMK.  I am (as many of
> > >>you can probably attest to :) not very smart sometimes.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Probably on the mirror discussion lists.
> > > 
> > 
> > There has been discussion there, but that list isn't open to the public. 
> >   It should be moved here to fedora-devel-list as this is important. 
> > Any ugly flaw in the design we will have to live with forever. =(
> 
> Stephen Smoogen posted an excellent layout to the mirrors-list - one
> that I think should be given some consideration.
> 

Well a lot of the 'ugly flaws' from Red Hat FTP site version 3.0 were
caused by me anyway. I should try to correct it. There are 2 things that
I would like to get comments on... when I did the first redesign,
apt-rpm,yum, autoupdate and such were either in infancy or non-existant.
How would redesign help/hurt them. Putting in hooks for those should be
easier now.


-- 
Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen at lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --