[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Univ-linux] Future unsupported Red Hat Linux systems



> > The big disconnect here I suspect is that we thought about Fedora Legacy
> > as "old Fedora" stuff. That meant it didn't appear on the "immediate
> > infrastucture radar". Obviously "legacy hat" or whatever has a clear=20
> > December kick off requirement
> 
> be an evolutionary outgrowth of what RHL was and not a clean start, then
> the legacy issues surrounding pre-fedora rhl releases, falls into the
> same evolutionary framework i think to some extent.

I'm not arguing about whether its a good idea or not. Jut explaining the
thinking so far and where that leaves some aspects of resource provision.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]