Default Folder icon no longer scalable?

[Alexander Larsson]

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:37, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:41, Garrett LeSage wrote:
> > Steven Garrity wrote:
> > 
> > > After installing test2, I noticed that the default folder icon (which 
> > > is beautiful by the way) is no longer scalable (bitmap only, not svg 
> > > anymore?). The previous installation I had was RedHat 9, and it did 
> > > include a scalable version of the default folder icon.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > It was never SVG.  I have included multiple versions of the folder at 
> > different sizes, but it seems that it wants to currently scale only from 
> > the 48x48 version.  Perhaps it is because I only have a 96x96 version as 
> > the largest size.  It could be quite possible that I need to include a 
> > 128x128 variety as well.  I will see if this is, in fact the issue.
> > 
> > Regardless, it should scale from a larger version if you are up-scaling.
> > 
> > We totally redid the way the icons are maintained.  It is much better 
> > now; it is easier for me to make updates and keep track of versions.  
> > Unfortunately, there are a couple of bugs here and there.  This issue is 
> > one of those.
> 
> I wonder whats causing it though. It should use the 96x96 version of the
> icon when scaling up larger than 48x48, but it doesn't see to do that.
> I'm not sure why.
> 
> > It's a bug.  Please file it in Bugzilla.  http://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> 
> Its already reported as:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106277

Ah, i know what it is. The 96x96/filesystems dir is not listed in the
Bluecurve index.theme file.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl at redhat.com    alla at lysator.liu.se 
He's a fast talking moralistic cat burglar on a mission from God. She's a 
scantily clad antique-collecting vampire with only herself to blame. They 
fight crime!