On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
So am I, but any time something changes, I can't contact n random developers and tell them what chagnes to incorporate into their packages very easily, and if I make a document and put it somewhere, I have no guarantee anyone will read it. I've direct
You did what you could. It's up to the otheres to do their part.
Post the doc, add it to the XF86 rpms with a link to the current version. After that it's up to others to follow.
Just like when any other developer changes a system used by others.
I cna tell you it's changed, but cannot force you to change.
(I still miss the XF86 setup tools. I usually build them myself though.
If someone wrote secondary config tool that required the XF86 versions, it's not your job to fix it. They were told to change, it's up to them to do so.)
The XFree86 supplied config tools are gone for 2 main reasons:
2) In many cases, people use them simply because they don't knowThose are the tools mentioned in the documentation for XF86 though.
Sounds like the fonts need fixed. The Type1 and TTF version should look the same (within the limits of the format). In the above, the Luxi TTF should be fixed, possibly removed untill it is fixed.
The Luxi TTF font isn't broken, so it can't be fixed. The Type1 font looks nicer because the Type1 font rendering technology isn't hindered by alleged patents like truetype rendering is. Also, I'm not sure if Luxi even has hints in it, and wether or not they're decent.
I can disable the Luxi TTF font if Owen and others think that's a
good idea. I think keeping it out of fontconfig should be adequate though more or less.