[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: OO.o from rawhide build



And don't forget to comment out all of the no-java patches in the
specfile, though in a perfect world it shouldn't be necessary.

Dan

On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 14:02, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >From discussion on this list, it is supposed to be a matter of a
> variable passed to rpmbuild.  Right now its to remove
> --disable-java and add --with-jdk-path in the spec file.
> 
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Ken Crandall wrote:
> 
> > What if you do have a JVM on the machine, and want to enable the java
> > support?  [Is there|Will there be] support for building OO.o both ways?
> >
> > Caveat: I haven't looked at the SRPM yet, so sorry if it's there already
> > and I don't know...
> >
> > Ken
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 09:01, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > Yep, I've got a patch made and stuffed into the 1.1.0-3 specfile for
> > > this.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the heads-up.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 11:54, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hmm, looks like the Java whacking patches check for java location even
> > > > > if you disable it, and that means you must have an old JDK installed
> > > > > too.  Will fix.
> > > >
> > > > That't it.  I've got an old kaffe.  Made it by adding an if to
> > > > config_office/configure.in...
> > > >
> > > > behdad
> > > >
> > > > > Dan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 11:44, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm trying to build OO.o from rawhide SRPM.  The configure is
> > > > > > called as:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./configure --enable-libart --enable-libsn
> > > > > > --with-lang="%{languages}" --disable-java --with-mozilla
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I still get:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > checking whether to build with Java support... no
> > > > > > checking for javac... no
> > > > > > checking for java... /usr/java/jre/bin/java
> > > > > > checking the installed JDK... configure: error: JDK is too old,
> > > > > > you need at least 1.3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Weird,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > behdad,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > > > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > behdad,
> > > > who is going to study after finishing this mail.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > > > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >
> 
> behdad,
> who is going to study after finishing this mail.
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]