[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Better packaging for older hardware?

On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:07:15PM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 10:05:41 at 10:05:41AM -0400, Michael K. Johnson (johnsonm redhat com) wrote:
> > It wouldn't be hard for us to provide an appropriately trimmed
> > config file in the kernel srpm
> Please do it! This would be an excellent solution.

What we can't do is come up with the definition of what to trim...

So when you have an initial set of suggestions for changes, lets
discuss the suggestions of changes here.

Just post them as
# CONFIG_FOO is not set
etc, for discussion.

> In other words, you might look at the RULE requirements, and just go
> for them. Specifically, a good starting point are these urls:

Well, Red Hat isn't going to create the set of suggested changes.
We can review suggestions and if some general agreement is reached
we can help keep a config file in sync because we have the
infrastructure to do it without too much pain; as I said before,
that would be opportunistic and when it broke, we wouldn't know
until the breakage was reported, and then we'd want to see the
suggested fix from RULE.


 "He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
 Linux Application Development                     -- Ben Franklin

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]