Argument list too long.
Michael K. Johnson
johnsonm at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 18:00:33 UTC 2003
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:12:25AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> I'm wondering if option 4 from the following article
>
> Linux Journal: "Argument list too long": Beyond Arguments and Limitations
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6060
>
> could be done for the Red Hat kernel (or the vanilla kernel) and if not,
> what the objections are.
The main objection from Red Hat's standpoint is that it changes the
semantics of a kernel interface in a way that really forks from the
vanilla kernel -- it would be really painful if programs you built on
a Red Hat system magically quit working when you put an upstream kernel
on the system.
So this should really be an lkml discussion. That shouldn't be
construed as a suggestion that everyone go spam lkml, of course...
michaelkjohnson
"He that composes himself is wiser than he that composes a book."
Linux Application Development -- Ben Franklin
http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list