Retain upgrade paths (was: /etc/redhat-release?)
ne...
akabi at speakeasy.net
Thu Sep 25 20:02:39 UTC 2003
On Sep 25, 2003 at 12:21, Jens Knutson in a maddening rage wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:06, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:44, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> > FWIW, I don't see why not. dBase II and RHEL 2.1 come to mind :-)
>>
>> Or worse than that. The first version of LaTeX was called 2.09!
>
>I think it's a good idea, especially a nice random sounding number like
>"2.09", just for the Discordian value.
How about 8.1. This would surely satisfy those ppl who were
waiting for RH8.1 and got RH9.
--
Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org)
Switch to: http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653
If a guru falls in the forest with no one to hear him, was he really a
guru at all?
-- Strange de Jim, "The Metasexuals"
16:01:36 up 32 days, 3:36, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list