gphoto2 and libgphoto2

Tim Waugh twaugh at redhat.com
Thu Apr 1 12:49:03 UTC 2004


On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:

> Is there a reason why gphoto2 and libgphoto2 are in the same package
> and not two seperate ones? I'd like a separate libgphoto2
> package. The library is used by more frontends then just gphoto2.

What's the advantage of separating the (tiny) gphoto2 binary out?

Tim.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040401/f63f495b/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list