Package Naming Guidlines

[Dams]

This is incorrect. If we have 1.0s < 1.0 then release V-R would have
been 1.0-0.X.s.%disttag for 1.0s and 1.0-X.%disttag for 1.0. with X > 1
in both cases. if we have 1.0s > 1.0 then we would have the same for 1.0
and 1.0-X+Y.s.%disttag for 1.0s. In any cases the "vepoch" (0.X/X/X+Y)
rules the release [before disttag].

	D

Le jeu 08/04/2004 à 18:10, Toshio a écrit :
> Things could break with strange enough upstream alphabetic release tags:
> Betas of 1.0 taking the form 1.0[a-z] will break on upgrade from 1.0s =>
> final (foo-1.0-1.s.rh9 => foobar-1.0-1.rh9)  Don't knwo if that's enough
> of a reason, though.

-- 
         Dams Nadé
Anvil/Anvilou on irc.freenode.net : #Linux-Fr, #Fedora
I am looking for a job : http://livna.org/~anvil/cv.php
"Dona Nobis Pacem E Dona Eis Requiem". Noir.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040408/de650b18/attachment.sig>