gaim security

Jef Spaleta jspaleta at princeton.edu
Sun Feb 1 14:36:16 UTC 2004


Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> It probably should be moved to the main tree as it has been in testing
> for over 2 weeks

Looking at the changelog of the gaim in fedora core 1 updates testing
and looking at the changelog for the rhl9 errata. It seems naively to me
that the gaim in testing doesn't have the security patch applied.  So
I don't think it's just a matter of moving the one in testing to
released. I think there needs to be a new package build for fedora.

-jef



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040201/c7c9ce02/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list