FHS 2.3?

[Matthew Miller]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 04:24:57AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> And if those distributions were LSB compliant, then one is to 
> assume that distros that do not switch to using /srv must be LSB 
> compliant also.  ;o)

To be fair, SuSE started doing that as a result of discussion on the LSB
list long ago.

In any case, I think it's a mistake to make /srv not-optional -- not all
systems have data that should go there. 

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>