Perl requires/provides proposal

Warren Togami warren at togami.com
Wed Feb 18 09:19:56 UTC 2004


> On 17 Feb 2004 10:29:53 -0500, Chip Turner wrote:
>
>> Would an errata of perl 5.8.3 for FC1 (and maybe RHL9) with the proper
>> provides, directory ownerships, etc help?  Anyone willing to help test
>> such a beast? :)
>
> Let's move forward and focus on FC2. Trying to update/maintain old
> releases only kills finite resources.
>
> Of course, you could release an FC1 Test Update anytime and hope for
> feedback, regardless of whether the update will make it.
>

I would advise only taking advantage of a perl upgrade opportunity like a
RH9 & FC1 major nbugfix or security issue where perl upgrade would be a
necessity.   Otherwise I would not want to upgrade perl only to implement
the virtual provides framework.  This is also not a solution for pre-RH9
distributions.

Agreed that we should focus on FC2.  We have plenty of issues there alone.

Warren





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list