PuTTY 0.54 rpms (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/)
Gavin Henry
ghenry at suretecsystems.com
Fri Feb 20 07:39:58 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 20 February 2004 00:10, Dag Wieers wrote:
> Hi Gavin,
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > for anyone that is interested I have made some rpms for the New Linux
> > version of PuTTY (http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/)
> >
> > I have hosted the rpms here:
> >
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/md5sums
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.noarch.rpm
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty.spec
> > http://www.suretecsystems.com/putty/putty-0.54-0.1.src.rpm
>
> I looked at your SPEC file and compared it what I had. I have the
> following differences:
>
> + What is the reason for choosing noarch ?
> + No desktop entry
> + No desktop icon
> + No manpages (there are 2 missing since the last release though)
> + You have a static version-less dependency for gtk+
> + Don't use %makeinstall where possible
Cheers Dag, I will look over this and reply later today.
>
> You can compare it with:
>
> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/putty.spec
>
> > Should I submit these to the Fedora QA team and update the specfile
> > Fedora standards and to fdr extension?
>
> For those interested for RHEL21, RH73, RH80, RH90, RHEL3 and RHFC1 at:
>
> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/putty/
>
> Kind regards,
> -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
- --
Kind Regards,
Gavin Henry.
Director.
Open Source. Open Solutions.
http://www.suretecsystems.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFANbnOeWseh9tzvqgRAmReAJ9C4IfOkCHM92BmGiXGBQAMuJx0KQCePX+q
dKvI7ycQR5vMQ6zaimBV64E=
=Qefr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list