Closing bugs UPSTREAM

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:18 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

> Hello Mark,
> 
> > 	We want to work upstream as much as possible.
> 
> With this I firmly agree. But that does not mean that bugs that are
> fixed locally (ie by applying upstream patches or update releases)
> should be closed as UPSTREAM, because in relation to the distribution
> they are fixed CURRENTRELEASE.
> 
[snip]
But would not CURRENTRELEASE indicate that an update has been released
by the distributor (Red Hat/Fedora) ? It's similar to RAWHIDE which
indicate that the bug has been closed in the development tree.

- Michel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040222/8bf5b0db/attachment.sig>