EOLed products and CURRENTRELEASE

[Bart Martens]

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 16:40, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
> Hello,
> Would anybody object to closing bugs in EOLed products (currently
> RHL < 9) that are fixed in FC1 as CURRENTRELEASE?
> 	Mirek

Some of these bugs may still be interesting for Fedora Legacy. For bugs
in fedora.us bugzilla, add the keyword LEGACY, to have these bugs appear
in the selection for Fedora Legacy. I don't know what to do with the
bugs in redhat bugzilla. I'm having the impression that there are no
references to redhat bugzilla on the Fedora Legacy website. Should these
bugs be moved to the fedora.us bugzilla? Anyway, my point is, don't
close these bugs too quickly.
http://www.fedoralegacy.org/
http://www.fedora.us/LEGACY

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040226/2024a625/attachment.sig>