RPM spec in tar file (was Re: An introduction of the new cheerleader...)

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:19, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> Works fine. But the problem comes when Fedora wants one spec and
> Mandrake wants another. As far as I can tell, if the developer provides
> specs, it is presently not really possible to be distribution agnostic,
> or even responsive to  the various distributions, because they ofetn
> conflict.

Then tough luck. Unless distributions agree on a package naming
convention, your SOL.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040127/c3dadac1/attachment.sig>