Re: udev in initrd

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Florian La Roche (laroche redhat com) said: 
> > The issue here is that it's not *that* simple, once you
> > start handling all the devices that aren't in sysfs. Moreover,
> > it breaks the 'load module on device access' model.
> 
> I thought this is more the exception and such devices should go into
> a list of always available devices.

It's not really the exception; it's the impetus behind kmod and
module aliases in general.

Bill