[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nominate for removal: logwatch ?
- From: Stephen Smoogen <smoogen lanl gov>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: nominate for removal: logwatch ?
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:38:47 -0600
On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 11:08, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > that alternative is epylog and no, I didn't see it ever get merged.
>
> I concur. Stable 1.0.1 is out, and it's running very well for a growing
> number of users.
>
> http://linux.duke.edu/projects/epylog/
I like it a lot... except when trying to look at in pine :). I should
update to 1.0.1 and see how many unmatched items there are (and then try
to find the time to write filters for that.)
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- Please, I have had too much of the stupid today. Please wait until
-- tomorrow to say these things so my tolerance has refreshed.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]