[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: nominate for removal: logwatch ?



On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 11:08, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > 
> > that alternative is epylog and no, I didn't see it ever get merged.
> 
> I concur. Stable 1.0.1 is out, and it's running very well for a growing 
> number of users.
> 
> http://linux.duke.edu/projects/epylog/

I like it a lot... except when trying to look at in pine :). I should
update to 1.0.1 and see how many unmatched items there are (and then try
to find the time to write filters for that.)

-- 
Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Lab  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- Please, I have had too much of the stupid today. Please wait until
-- tomorrow to say these things so my tolerance has refreshed. 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]