[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20040715 changes



Maybe it's about time we had a FC repo cleanup day, everyone join IRC
and we debate what to ship to Extras to avoid duplication. 

- David

On tor, 2004-07-15 at 12:09 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:44, Build System wrote:
> >>
> >> balsa-2.2.0-1,FC3,2
> >> -------------------
> >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis redhat com> 2.2.0-1,FC3,2
> >>
> >> - add a 64 bit patch
> >>
> >> * Wed Jul 14 2004 John Dennis <jdennis redhat com> 2.2.0-1,FC3,1
> >>
> >> - bring up to latest upstream
> >>   had to change the following from the upstream src rpm:
> >>   dependency on pspell to aspell
> >>   build dependency on libesmtp to libesmtp-devel
> >>   comment out packager rpm tag, RH build system won't accept it
> >>
> >> * Sat Jul 26 2003 Misu Moldovan <dumol go ro>
> >>
> >> - further split the Red Hat and Mandrake sections
> >> - fix Mandrake 9.x dependencies
> >
> > Hum.. if we're *talking* about removing ethereal then I think balsa's
> > removal from core should at least be discussed: I can't recall the last
> > time I've seen anybody even mention using Balsa. Of course it's possible
> > a) I haven't seen balsa-related discussions because I'm not looking for
> > them b) it's so perfect the users are too happy to complain ... but
> > somehow I doubt both of those. We got plenty enough email-clients in
> > core already, I think balsa would be best moved to Extras.
> >
> > 	- Panu -
> 
> I would say the same of licq, that we should move these less popular clients into extras.
> 
> Warren
> 
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]