[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20040715 changes



On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 17:02 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:22 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> 
> > I think balsa is a nice, simple MUA and I generally recommend it for users
> > that I install Linux for.  I'm not a fan of the current Outlook/Evolution
> > approach.  Having said that, balsa is a great candidate for Fedora Extras.
> >  If people want to reduce the size of Fedora Core (this opinion seems to
> > be pretty much unanimous) then we need to start making compromises like
> > this.
> 
> The problem with most MUAs, is that they don't support advanced
> features, like SASL authentication (CRAM-MD5, Kerberos, X.509, etc) or
> disconnected (offline) operation when using IMAP. That's one of the
> reasons I keep using Evolution, since I *need* Kerberos authentication
> support to access my IMAP mailbox. AFAIK, only Pine does also support
> Kerberos authentication via SASL.

Mutt supports it too, FWIW.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]