[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: -doc subpackage Group tag

> >>Steven Pritchard wrote :
> >>>Oops.  That's what I get for just doing rpm -qp *-doc-* without
> >>>looking at all of the descriptions.  :-)

> >Matthias Saou wrote:
> >>Not to mention that you missed all the *-docs-* packages ;-)

> Mark Derricutt wrote:
> >Strike one for consistent naming :)

My thought exactly.

On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> + apache manual I think...

Most of the rest of the documentation packages already have the right

  gnome-user-docs  Documentation
  iiimf-docs       Documentation
  postgresql-docs  Applications/Databases
  python-docs      Documentation
  ruby-docs        Documentation
  httpd-manual     Documentation

So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be
renamed to *-docs)?  Or maybe we should just make sure all of the
packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still
works (at least for apt).

Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve kspei com             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-7360               Mobile: (618)567-7320

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]