-doc subpackage Group tag
Steven Pritchard
steve at silug.org
Sat Jul 17 16:19:48 UTC 2004
> >>Steven Pritchard wrote :
> >>>Oops. That's what I get for just doing rpm -qp *-doc-* without
> >>>looking at all of the descriptions. :-)
> >Matthias Saou wrote:
> >>Not to mention that you missed all the *-docs-* packages ;-)
> Mark Derricutt wrote:
> >Strike one for consistent naming :)
My thought exactly.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> + apache manual I think...
Most of the rest of the documentation packages already have the right
group.
gnome-user-docs Documentation
iiimf-docs Documentation
postgresql-docs Applications/Databases
python-docs Documentation
ruby-docs Documentation
httpd-manual Documentation
So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be
renamed to *-docs)? Or maybe we should just make sure all of the
packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still
works (at least for apt).
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-7360 Mobile: (618)567-7320
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list