[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: -doc subpackage Group tag
- From: Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: -doc subpackage Group tag
- Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 21:15:42 +0300
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:19, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be
> renamed to *-docs)?
FC3test1: 10 * -doc, 5 * -docs, 1 * -manual.
fedora.us: 2 * -doc, 2 * -docs, 0 * -manual.
rpmseek.com: 1204 * -doc, 129 * -docs, 141 * -manual (mostly JPackage)
Dunno about renaming, but based on the above, -doc could at least be a
recommendation for new packages (but then again, IMVHO -docs "sounds"
better ;).
> Or maybe we should just make sure all of the
> packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still
> works (at least for apt).
Well, if adding the Provides, one could add Obsoletes and rename while
at it... assuming a miracle happens and there's suddenly a consensus
what they should be renamed to.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]