[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Any consensus on a groupware suite for FC/RHEL?



On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 13:51 -0400, David T Hollis wrote:
> Most of the components of Kolab are already included in Fedora which is
> great, but they have built/designed it so that it fits into it's own
> box, everything running under it's own directory which I'm really not a
> fan of.  I took a stab in the past at creating a package for it and what
> it will ultimately require is a lot of patching to the scripts to set
> correct paths and directories.  Other than that, it should be fairly
> feasible.

Actually, the fault is in Kolab, which had a very short deadline and
some things haven't been made the best ay possible...

I'd love it even more if most of this services were configured to run
chrooted by default...

Rui
-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]