[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: eclipse native?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Doug Stewart wrote:
| Chuck Mead wrote:
|
| Some time ago there was some comment that eclipse was going native and
| was being readied for FC2 or FC3... did that go anywhere?

| Try here:
| http://people.redhat.com/jhealy/eclipse/

| (as noted in this LJ article:
| http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7549 - it seems the text of
| the article is only available in the Dead Tree edition, but the links
| are still there).

I've been there already. The version there is RHEL3 based which may, or
may not, be an issue but I was wondering if this was going forward for
FC2/3.

- --
Chuck Mead <csm redhat com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBCRfFZfy0juH51WsRAoMSAKCg5S6JE2oU6w2HA3+AbxkkClpEbQCgkHDa
vEUJ+9FDI5+pHyHEQtl+2MU=
=gy1H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]