packages that BuildRequire: gettext that need to change to gettext-devel

Colin Walters walters at redhat.com
Tue Jun 22 21:23:30 UTC 2004


On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 23:12 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > So as an alternative, I'd like to move autopoint (and probably more
> > development tools) into gettext-devel.  See bug #126071.  This brings up
> > the main point: a lot of packages presently BuildRequire: gettext, and I
> > think all of them will need to change to gettext-devel.  This is the
> > list from rawhide:
> 
> I think this exactly shows why it does not make sense to list buildreqs
> in too much detail. gettext/texinfo/auto*/libtool etc all should be
> required elsewhere.

So you are advocating leaving gettext/gettext-devel as-is, and adding
Requires: cvs to the gettext package?  Or are you advocating changing
packages that use autopoint to BuildRequire cvs manually?  Or something
else?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040622/cc40afcb/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list