No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes)
Aaron Bennett
aaron.bennett at olin.edu
Fri Jun 25 16:39:55 UTC 2004
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
>. I think having a kernel-devel subpackage
>makes a lot of sense, especially if the goal is to treat the kernel
>package similarly to other packages. I dont need to compile modules on
>most of the computers I admin, so I dont need the associated bits.
>
>
>
Sorry also for coming late to this thread, but I'd like to endorse
kernel-devel as well. It could provide the /lib/modules/$(uname
-r)/build stuff as well as the /usr/src/linux stuff which is currently
in kernel-source. Also it could make sure that /lib/modules/$(uname
-r)/build is a symlink to the appropriate place in /usr/src/linux which
would make building legacy modules easier.
So, my proposal is:
Fold kernel-source into kernel-devel; make kernel-devel have Provides:
kernel-source to make BuildRequires in older kernel src rpms easier to
live with, and keep it as part of Fedora Core.
--
Aaron Bennett
UNIX Administrator
Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list