Unnanounced migration phase at its end, non-transparency, "open" community project ... (was: No more kernel-source(code) ???)

[Arjan van de Ven]

> If you are going to change this procedure for Fedora Core to something 
> like "install the src.rpm, edit a config file and rebuild it etc," it 
> should not change mid-release!!!!!!!!!  

Nobody, and I mean nobody, suggested doing this for FC2 so far.

> If RedHat is going to continue to ship default kernels on a 
> user-oriented "community supported" linux distribution that lack crucial 
> functionality for a large percentage of your target audience, you've got 
> to make it clear how to enable this stuff.  And I'm not saying you 
> won't, or that great document is not in the pipes or anything like 
> that.  I'm just anticipating the FLOOD of bad reviews that a Fedora Core 
> distribution which lacks /usr/src/linux will generate, that's all.

we already don't ship /usr/src/linux since about RHL7.1 days...

http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/rpm/index.html is what I hope google will point at....


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040628/75426aea/attachment.sig>