k3b fedora.us reviews or new maintainer wanted!

[Michael Schwendt]

My update packages for k3b are in need of further reviews according
to the fedora.us package submission and QA policies.

  k3b 0.11.6 (one review)
  https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1106

  k3b i18n 0.11
  https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1341

Alternatively, if someone likes to take over the packages (I'm not the
initial packager and have prepared the 0.9.x and 0.10.x updates only),
that would be appreciated, too, as I would add the required review.


My motivation to review and approve new packages has reached an all-time
low, when I see that the very few packages which I maintain or which I
have brought into shape during QA, don't seem to get published.

Notice that most package updates are considerably easier to review than
new package requests, since an update can be compared with the previous
release.  Verification and confirmation of the included tarball checksum
is the most important step.

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040318/8048a23c/attachment.sig>