Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
Jeremy Katz
katzj at redhat.com
Wed Mar 31 00:14:47 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:04, seth vidal wrote:
> I don't think talking about whether or not we like them is useful here.
> It is the fhs and fedora core should be compliant with it.
There are plenty of standards out there that are just silly, so
compliance for the sake of compliance is probably not the best
approach.
Note: I'm not arguing one way or another on this one, just saying that
using the argument of "it's a standard" is somewhat weak.
Jeremy
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list