[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Gnome 2.6.1 and FC2

On Sat, 1 May 2004, Matthew Miller wrote:

>On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:50:59PM -0700, Per Bjornsson wrote:
>> If the answer is "no", is it because of perceived destabilization or
>> because it takes time from new development? If it is the latter, would
>> it be possible for volunteer-packaged updates to be considered for
>> inclusion as official updates? (I believe that the FC2 Gnome is very
>> close to upstream, so it's likely that very little patch updating etc
>> would have to be done - is that a correct assumption? I can see that for
>> heavily patched packages would be more difficult for someone who is not
>> the original packager to package a sane update.)
>I think it's a bad idea to go down that road. Whole new Fedora Core releases
>are planned to be quite frequent; within each one, the packages should be as
>stable as possible.

I think that people who want 2.6.1 can make the packages and put them in 
fedora.us for cooking.

Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Lab  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]