[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Bastille



While having a doc would be great. I think users would be happy to
have something that would also do the work for them. I understand that
a lot of security measures are already taken on the Fedora installs
but the user should be made aware and can also have a choice in the
details of the security measures taken. If they want ftp off but
telnet on they can do so while being made aware of the implications of
doing so. This is why Bastille has been so popular.


On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 20:31:40 +0100, Stuart Ellis <s ellis fastmail co uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:59:10 -0400, "Janina Sajka" <janina rednote net>
> said:
> > So, while it has much to teach and offers good advice, I'd really
> > rather that Bastille were a HOWTO and not an "I'll fix it for you"
> > script.
> >
> > It's nice to be given a fish to eat, but it's nicer to know how to catch
> > fish. Same old same old.
> 
> If the docs approach is of interest - there is a "Hardening Fedora"
> tutorial currently being written as part of the documentation project.
> The tracking bug:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129957
> 
> There is an ongoing thread about this tutorial on fedora-docs as well.
> --
> Stuart Ellis
> s ellis fastmail co uk
> 
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]