NCPFS Support
Paul
subsolar at subsolar.org
Sun Apr 10 02:54:27 UTC 2005
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 15:32 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 21:32 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:30:20AM -0500, Paul wrote:
> > > > Can anybody here answer the question as to why NCPFS is being listed as
> > > > "not being on the roadmap"?
> > > >
> > > > Seeing that we run Novell it's rather handy to have, also most schools
> > > > in the area run Novell and I'm curious as to why it's being dropped.
> > >
> > > (14:19:58:davej at nwo:~)$ modinfo ncpfs
> > > filename: /lib/modules/2.6.11-1.1231_FC4smp/kernel/fs/ncpfs/ncpfs.ko
> > > license: GPL
> > > srcversion: 48FE1F47EB82AE5EB3A295D
> > > depends:
> > > vermagic: 2.6.11-1.1231_FC4smp SMP gcc-4.0
> > >
> > > It's been there forever.
> >
> > can i ask why it was removed from rhel4 along with ipx support?
> >
>
> not on this list, you can't.
>
> this isn't a rhel list.
Well it's listed under Packages Deprecated
* ncpfs — No longer part of Fedora Core profile
I guest my question is, why is it being deprecated?
This does tie into FL's question, though I agree RHEL is not on-topic
for this list.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list