Fedora 4 XEN and Kernel 2.4xenU

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:34 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 18 avril 2005 à 22:18 +1000, Russell Coker a écrit :
> > On Friday 01 April 2005 05:56, Roland Käser <roli at israel-jugendtag.ch> wrote:
> > >  >I don't see any particular benefit offered by running a 2.4 kernel in
> > >
> > > a 2.6 Xen host.
> > > Have You ever tried to install a Oracle 9 on "modern" fedora release? I
> > > can sing some songs about this crap. (The oracle not the Fedora).
> > 
> > Why would you want to run Oracle on Fedora?  RHEL costs much less than Oracle 
> > and will make things much easier for you.
> > 
> > You might ask whether a RHEL3 update for Xen will be released (RHEL3 was 2.4 
> > based while RHEL4 is 2.6 based).  But it's not a question for this list.
> 
> If you are a dev shop building apps on top of Oracle (apps that will
> then be sold to wealthy corporations that will shell $$$$ for Oracle
> licenses) Oracle will let you install as many Oracle setups as you like
> (they realise this helps selling their products)
> 
> If you want to host these free developer instances on RHEL Red Hat will
> enforce through up2date a full license per dev/test system.

which is why you join the RH developers program.... ;)

please take rhel rants to a rhel mailinglist.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050419/510bc810/attachment.sig>