openoffice 2.0 & FC4 - status, plans

[Paul]

Hi,

>By including ooo 1.9.x in FC4 test1, more people will test it. There are
>already rpms available on people.redhat.com. Please report ooo bugs at
>http://www.openoffice.org/issues/enter_bug.cgi
>and packaging bugs at
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%
>20Core&

I'd love to see OOo2(beta) incorporated into rawhide today if truth be
told as it is way and above better than the standard OOo. I can see the
RH arguments against it though, but given that the schedule for both to
be released is about the same time, a small delay in FC4 to incorporate
it would be acceptable (IMO at least).

TTFN

Paul
-- 
"I don't know how World War III will be fought, but I do know World War
IV will be fought with sticks and stones" - Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050212/214c75aa/attachment.sig>