[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: mod_dav_svn update

Le jeudi 13 janvier 2005 Ã 10:05 +0000, Joe Orton a Ãcrit :
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:33:13PM +0100, FÃliciano Matias wrote:
> > Is this a bug ?
> > $ rpm -q --scripts bind
> > postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
> > if [ "$1" -ge 1 ]; then
> >         /etc/rc.d/init.d/named condrestart >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
> > fi
> I'd say it depends on the daemon, for some it could be necessary.  But
> for any network-facing daemon I would say that it's surprising and
> undesirable behaviour if a package update breaks active client
> connections etc.  Making configuration changes take effect from a %post
> is unfriendly; especially if the config is not marked noreplace.

When I update my system, the propose is to use the new version (security
fix, ...). Perhaps it's better to schedule an update at midnight than
when there is a rush of connection. It's up to the administrator to
decide when and how to update his system.
If daemons are not restarted when I update a system then when this
append ?
Do you ask me to always reboot my computer after "yum update" ? Too bad.
Suppose I update httpd and httpd is not restarted. One week later the
server is restarted (power failure), the new httpd does not start and
"bad luck" I am in holidays...

What do you think about this scenario ?

btw, "service httpd reload" (or condreload) is not enough alter an
update ?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]