[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20050126 changes

Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 Ã 21:27 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a Ãcrit :
> Le mercredi 26 janvier 2005 Ã 20:17 +0100, FÃliciano Matias a Ãcrit :
> > For me, RHEL can be :
> > FC + FE + other things 
> One big reason RH is in Fedora is for the RHEL it makes out of it
> One big reason a lot of people use Fedora is the RedHat touch they get
> for free. So it's a symbiotic relationship.
> I for one would be the last to complain I have access in FC to large
> parts of RHEL. We're not talking about resources Red Hat is taking from
> parts of Fedora to reallocate elsewhere (which is IMHO a large part of
> what's extra is about). We're talking about ressources Red Hat already
> allocated for its *paying* customers and is sharing for free with FC
> users (If you just take a peek at who's maintaining the java packages
> you'll see they're not people already contributing heavily to other
> parts of FC. So don't worry your packages are safe).

Nice speech.

> Complaining about a free gift is not overly polite.

What are you talking about ?

I just try to figure out why java stuff should be in Fedora Core.
I think some java stuff can be push in Fedora Extra. In don't think
jakarta is a "core component" for an OS. I do not use java a lot and
perhaps I am wrong.
If you don't agree with my point, just explain why I am wrong.

PS : I use Fedora and I use/buy RHEL. I am really happy with the Red
Hat's work and how Red Hat manage business and free software.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]