[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: What next?



On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal phy duke edu) said: 
> > I think continuing the migration of misc items to extras and making core
> > truly core is good.
> > 
> > I'd be willing to work toward:
> >  - extras organization into package groups or even sub-repos
> 
> Including extending this to CD grouping? (I should write up
> the strawman proposal for this.)

Yah - I think it should. Although I tell you what I'd like - I think
making it easy for users to make their own 'extras' cds that include the
stuff they want + deps would make the most sense.

you tell a program a list of packages you want and it compiles a list of
that package + all its deps from extras and puts them in cd-sized
subdirs.


that would take some sorting work but it's not outside the realm of
possibility.

-sv



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]