Fedora Goals -- LSB-compliant/ideal init for FC5+

[Edginton, Brian (GE Healthcare)]

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:17 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Razvan Corneliu C.R. Vilt (razvan.vilt at linux360.ro) said: 
> > Good point. But based on the docs on the internet, we could implement 
> > something similar in functionality. They kinda had the same problems 
> > that we are facing right now. I suspect that it should be soon covered 
> > by the CDDL Licence, provided the imminent OpenSolaris release. Although 
> > not GPL, I think that it's good enough to be included in Fedora Core, 
> > due to it's Mozilla Public Licence heritage diff at 
> > http://www.sun.com/cddl/CDDL_MPL_redline.pdf and FAQ at 
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/faq/licensing_faq.html and licence at 
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/license/cddl_license.txt.
> 
> No, CDDL (like ASPL, actually) isn't a viable license for Fedora code.
> 
> Bill
> 

Bill, 

 Specifics?

-edge

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050607/91194ce8/attachment.sig>