ESP Ghostscript 8.x for FC5

[Neal Becker]

Neal Becker wrote:

> Tim Waugh wrote:
> 
>> (Dropping fedora-test-list, since this is not relevant on that list.)
>> 
>> ESP Ghostscript 8.15rc3 is now in the development tree.  This is
>> targetted at Fedora Core 5.  Please help test it out and see if I've
>> missed anything.
>> 
>> I'm particularly interested in any regressions compared to the Fedora
>> Core 4 package (ghostscript-7.07-40).
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:35:12AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> 
>>> Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/bin/bdftops from install of
>>> ghostscript-8.1
>>> 5-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
>>> [Lots more similar conflicts]
>> 
>> This is because you have something that still requires something that
>> the old ghostscript provides.  Do you have ImageMagick < 6.2.2.0-3
>> perhaps?
>> 
>> Tim.
>> */
> for file in $(rpm -q --whatrequires ghostscript); do echo "..." $file &&
> ( rpm -q --requires$file | grep ghostscript; ); done
> ... ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13
> ghostscript
> ... hpijs-1.7.1-3
> ghostscript
> ... gnome-print-0.37-11
> ghostscript
> ghostscript-fonts
> ... ghostscript-devel-7.07-40
> ghostscript = 7.07-40
> ... ghostscript-gtk-7.07-40
> ghostscript = 7.07-40
> ... system-config-printer-0.6.131-1
> ghostscript >= 6.51-16
> ... gsview-4.6-10
> ghostscript >= 7.07-15.3
> ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1
> ghostscript
> ghostscript-fonts
> ghostscript
> ghostscript-fonts
> ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1
> ghostscript
> ghostscript-fonts
> ghostscript
> ghostscript-fonts
> ... scribus-1.2.1-5
> ghostscript >= 7.07
> 
> Looks like the culprits are ghostscript-fonts and ghostscript-gtk
> 

Sorry, that's ghostscript-devel and ghostscript-gtk.