Any reason we're using libdv-0.103?

[Warren Togami]

sean wrote:
> libdv-0.104 was announced in November, 2004. We're using 0.103. I could 
> hack the spec file from 0.103 to build 0.104, but I figured I'd better 
> ask if there's a reason to stick with 0.103.
> 
> sean
> 

0.104 wouldn't even build on x86_64.  Upstream clearly didn't know what 
they were doing when they added x86_64 specific asm.  There is little 
real benefit to 0.104.  We'll get there eventually for FC5, hopefully 
after upstream makes a real release that works on all archs.  FC4 
Updates maybe... if there is a real reason to do so.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com