[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: lm_sensors in FC4-updates for x86_64 twice?

On 11/27/2005 06:38:28 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:33:16PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 22:53 +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > > no, I don't want to hear any bitching and moaning about this, that's
> > > it is.
> >
> > At some point we should change this to only pull in as few packages as
> > really needed, but that also comes with quite some calculation cost.
> why isn't the way it's currently being done correct? We've gone round
> and round on this and its always come down to how to handle globs of
> commands.

Sometimes less is more. Why should a system be polluted with i386
packages, if the user does not need them?

Indeed. But that should be considered by the repo creator. If there is no need for a i386 variant of package X then X.i386 should not be in the x86_64 repo.

Regards, Willem Riede.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]