[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: hesiod lib problem



Erwin Rol wrote:
I don't know how, but the problem is back again today;

  Updating  : libgnome                     ##################### [
1/295]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link


- Erwin


On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:15 -0400, Richard Hally wrote:
for several days, ldconfig has been throwing the following errors:


   Updating  : subversion                   ##################### [ 19/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

   Updating  : libstdc++-devel              ##################### [ 20/106]
   Updating  : libgnat                      ##################### [ 21/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

   Updating  : libobjc                      ##################### [ 22/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

   Updating  : xorg-x11-server-Xorg         ##################### [ 23/106]
   Updating  : metacity                     ##################### [ 24/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

   Updating  : libgomp                      ##################### [ 25/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

   Updating  : cpp                          ##################### [ 26/106]
   Updating  : gcc                          ##################### [ 27/106]
   Updating  : libgfortran                  ##################### [ 28/106]
/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libhesiod.so.0 is not a symbolic link

The pertinent part of /usr/lib looks like this:

[root LinuxNew2 lib]# ll libhe*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16846 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    18 Mar 31 10:03 libhesiod.so -> libhesiod.so.0.0.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42747 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40863 Mar 30 17:40 libhesiod.so.0.0.0
[root LinuxNew2 lib]#

How should this be fixed?



I am seeing this also and don't see a bz on it.  Should there be a bz?

--
Regards,

Old Fart
(my reply-to address is "munged" to defeat spambots)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]