ipw3945 packaging

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Apr 26 16:07:17 UTC 2006


On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:00:16PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > The answer as always for drivers in the main kernel package is "get it
> > > upstream".  And for better or worse, I think that the regulatory daemon
> > > is likely to be a big sticking point for the driver going upstream :(
> > 
> > It sounded like this was more liked than the firmware approach.
> 
> By who?  I read exactly the opposite :)

I read an article by thl on heise.de (in german), where it was
supposed to be considered better that propriatry kernel stuff
or. Maybe I should check the original tone.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060426/5c79d779/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list