CPU Frequency Scaling

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 14:49 -0500, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:50 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > gconf does not need to be "fixed" (well it does but that's not the major
> > problem). What need to be "fixed" are developper assumptions and the way
> > they routinely abuse gconf in admin-unfriendly ways.
> 
> Bah, blanket statement, anyone can write crap with even the finest
> tools. So, care to make specific complaints about g-p-m's scheme
> 
>  http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-power-manager/data/gnome-power-manager.schemas.in?rev=1.52&view=markup
> 
> and how that is "difficult" for admins to grasp? My only complaint is
> that perhaps g-p-m suffers from too many options.

Care to post an actual conf file sample ? That's what sysadmins will
see. gnome-power-manager.schemas.in is about as interesting to them as a
corba IDL declaration.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061205/b931bcaa/attachment.sig>